|
BRIEF
Battle
for Gagra
Still unresolved, the war in Abkhazia 1992-1993 is largely overlooked.
At the time nationalism was rampant throughout the Caucasus.
Georgia, reeling from an internal squabble between its first
elected president, Zviad Gamsakhurdia, and the head of the National
Guard, Tengiz Kitovani and his ally Dzaba Ioseliani, launched
an ill-fated attempt to solidify central government control over
separatist minded Abkhazia.
The Georgians were finally driven out a year and a half later
(September 1993) by Abkhazian forces strengthened, if not spearheaded,
by hundreds of North Caucasus volunteers, among them future Chechen
field commanders Shamil Basayev and Ruslan Galayev. Basayev actually
received the Hero of Abkhazia medal and was credited for, among
other military feats, liberating the northern city of Gagra and
pushing the Georgians across the Psou River into Russia proper,
where they were repatriated to Georgia via the ports at Poti
and Batumi.
Although it took place early in the conflict, the Battle for
Gagra was a turning point in the war. Georgian forces had made
an amphibious landing to seize Gagra during the first weeks of
the war, intending to then push southward and squeeze Abkhazian
forces in a pincer movement between a second Georgian force moving
north from Sukhumi. The Georgian forces’ failure to hold
the strategic northern city, let alone use it as a base to launch
further attacks southward, severely hampered its efforts to impose
its will against the Abkhazian separatist movement.
Finally, there has been much written about Russia’s involvement
in Abkhazia. Most analysis insists that without Russian support
Abkhazia would not have been able to break free (In fact, believing
Abkhazia to be another Transdeniester, hundreds of Ukrainian
volunteers fought on the Georgian side). However, there are problems
with this analysis. First, most of the foreign fighters involved
in Abkhazia were not Russian soldiers but, like Shamil Basayev,
independent minded fighters from the north Caucasus. Others came
from the Abkhazian diaspora, primarily from Turkey. Second, complaints
of Russian armor and aircraft involved in the fighting as proof
of Russian complicity is problematic, as all armor and aircraft
on both sides of the conflict was of Russian/Soviet origin. Georgian
officials have even claimed publicly that they themselves “rented” Russian
tanks and their crews for combat missions by the day or even
by the hour, more accurately suggesting that rather than an instrument
of policy, the Russian army, in a state of flux in 1992, was
open to the highest bidder. Assuming that Abkhazian separatism
was a Kremlin supported policy, it is more accurate that Russian
interests and those of the north Caucasus volunteers dovetailed
in Abkhazia, albeit for different reasons, creating a condition
where Yeltsin had to do little but stand by and watch those pesky
Chechens fight their battles for them. |