But panelists at BYU hold out hope for peace
By Tad Walch
Deseret Morning News
PROVO — Hamida al-Masudi is optimistic about the long-term
future of her native Iraq, but she and other members of a roundtable
discussion at Brigham Young University on Wednesday said the short-term
prognosis is grim.
Hamida al-Masudi talks of sectarian differences
in her home country of Iraq during Wednesday's discussion. She said
it is crucial to teach love and forgiveness. (Jason Olson, Deseret
Morning News)
Jason Olson, Deseret Morning News
Hamida al-Masudi talks of sectarian differences in her home country
of Iraq during Wednesday's discussion. She said it is crucial to
teach love and forgiveness.
"Despite explosions around them, people keep leading their lives in a
normal way," Masudi, a graduate student at the University of Utah, told
the Deseret Morning News. "Kids are going to school, laughing
in the streets. This makes me optimistic. When I think of those people
living in peace, I have a good expectation for the future. Iraqis
are eager to live a peaceful life."
First they must navigate the violence that will accompany President
Bush's troop surge and its accompanying crackdown in Baghdad.
To get from there to long-term peace, the six panelists who spoke
about the future of Iraq at BYU's Kennedy Center said the United
States must emphasize political solutions alongside force.
"Everybody sees that what is needed in Iraq is a political
as well as a military solution," said BYU journalism professor
John Hughes, a former editor of the Deseret Morning News and Pulitzer
Prize-winning foreign correspondent. "While
not to seem too gloomy, I do not see a political solution emerging
from the Maliki government."
The panel was organized because some BYU political scientists were
concerned Americans aren't engaged in discussions about solutions,
said Eric Hyer, a professor who studies international security issues.
Looking ahead proved difficult.
"I can't tell you what's going to happen there," said Hughes, who
held three jobs in the Reagan administration and also worked as an assistant
secretary-general of the United Nations. "One of the interesting things
that we should be concerned about is how what happens — what the ultimate
resolution is in Iraq — will affect the Islamic lands of the
region, and indeed Iran."
BYU Middle East expert Donna Lee Bowen is concerned about the same
thing.
"However bad you think things may be now, things can always get worse," she
said. "There are no groups that are uniformly good guys, that
are on the side of the angels. Everyone has hands that are somewhat
dirty.
"The choices we make are not clear cut. There is no group
that is going to lead us into the solution."
The country is fragmenting, with militias splintering into smaller
groups. High unemployment is propelling young people into these gangs,
Bowen said.
"We also see something even more dangerous, which is an increasing
identification in the Middle East and within the Muslim world that
this is Sunni vs. Shia and seeing this as a combatant pose."
To counter the problem, Bowen and visiting professor and European
security expert Chris Jones said the U.S. government should be talking
with numerous small groups to increase American understanding of
their concerns so the United States can present scenarios that benefit
them and peace.
Several of the panelists urged the United States to bring Iran
into the dialogue.
Independent filmmaker Dodge Billingsley, who has been embedded
with U.S. troops in Iraq, made one of the strongest predictions.
"I think we're in for a fight in Baghdad in the next 60 to
90 days, a battle for Baghdad," he said. "It probably will
be like the battle for Fallujah, where there were 350 to 400 house-to-house
fights."
Billingsley said the United States needs to create reconstruction
teams that would follow the army.
Former Deseret Morning News editor John Hughes speaks during "The
Future of Iraq" roundtable at BYU. (Jason Olson, Deseret Morning
News)
Jason Olson, Deseret Morning News
Former Deseret Morning News editor John Hughes speaks during "The
Future of Iraq" roundtable at BYU.
"There's been no mobilization of a reconstruction corps. They
need to be there one day after the firefight."
He also worried that the Baghdad surge will be undermanned. The
Baghdad offensive might have as many as 85,000 troops, he said, even
though U.S. General David Petraeus has said he needs 120,000.
One student asked if dividing the country to give Shia, Sunnis
and Kurds their own regions wouldn't solve the problem.
Masudi said other than Kurds, Iraqis reject the notion. One problem
would be the division of oil revenue between the three groups.
Hughes predicted more violence in the short term but that Bush
will draw down troops by mid-2008.
"I don't see how President Bush in political terms could avoid having
substantial troop cuts in place by mid-2008," he said. "I
don't see how he can lead the Republican Party into an election with
the kind of numbers of troops that are there now ... ."
Hughes also expressed concern about future U.S. involvement in the
region.
He also observed that "it's absolutely essential that the
United States must remained engaged in the rest of the Middle East,
whatever the outcome in Iraq."
For Masudi, time is a necessary component for changing the mindset
of the Iraqi people, who have lived without peace for decades.
"We need to start teaching kids to love, to forgive," she
said. "A
national reconciliation needs to happen."
To watch a Webcast or download a podcast of the 75- minute roundtable
discussion, visit kennedy.byu.edu. The Kennedy Center also will post
a suggested reading and viewing list on Iraq on the Web site.
View Original |